Page 353 - Proceedings book
P. 353

q
                cd;sl mqrdúoHd iu¿j 2025
               1.1.1. Museums and Collective Consciousness

               Memory plays a central role in shaping both individual and collective identities, with
               Collective  Memory  binding  societies  and  influencing  cultural  evolution  and  moral


               frameworks (Halbwachs, 1992, pp. 22-49). Halbwachs ’ theory asserts that memory is
               a social construct, shaped by the groups to which individuals belong. In war museums,
               this  theory  helps  explain  how  institutions  frame  national  identities  by  presenting

               history  from  particular  group  perspectives,  influencing  how  societies  remember
               violence and envision the future. As active agents of memory, museums determine

               which stories are told and whose voices are amplified, with significant socio-political
               implications  (Kavanagh,  2000,  p.  3).  Harari’s  concept  of  Collective  Imagination

               further reveals how shared beliefs shape societal identities and interpretations of past

               traumas  and  future  possibilities  (Harari,  2015,  p.  32).  Through  exhibitions  and
               education,  war  museums  support  reconciliation  and  healing,  promoting  national

               identity while fostering societal continuity and future aspirations (Bennett, 1995 pp.
               1-30; Connerton, 2009, pp. 7-40).


               1.1.2. Museums and Narratives of Violence

               Violence has played a significant role in shaping human history, with theories like the

               “Killer Ape” hypothesis (Ardrey, 1961, pp. 30–50) suggesting aggression was central
               to early social structures (Keeley, 1996, pp. 36–37 and pp. 55–56). In modern times,

               war,  genocide,  and  conflict  museums  face  complex  decisions  in  how  to  present

               violent histories. They must navigate the challenges of whether to emphasize military
               achievements, focus on victimhood, or promote critical reflection (Williams, 2007, pp.

               16-25). Museums are tasked with constructing narratives that are historically accurate
               and inclusive while recognizing the sensitivities of the subjects they represent. These

               institutions walk a fine line between factual representation and emotional resonance,
               considering the broader social and political contexts in which they operate (Williams,

               2007,  pp.  16-25).  The  way  museums  curate  their  exhibitions  can  influence  how

               societies  remember  and  interpret  violent  histories,  and  the  narratives  presented  can
               either facilitate understanding or perpetuate division.









                                                       332
   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358